Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S E3.1 and Macan Turbo 95B.1 are neck and neck (4,63 s vs 4,65 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne S E3.1 | Macan Turbo 95B.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s−0,02 s | 4,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,79 s−0,15 s | 12,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,26 s−0,36 s | 23,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h | 264 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne S E3.1 | Macan Turbo 95B.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,21 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,38 s | 3,46 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s | 4,65 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,04 s | 6,29 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,10 s | 10,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,21 s | 17,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,79 s | 12,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,26 s | 23,62 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 925 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Cayenne S hits 100 km/h in 4.64 s versus 4.65 s for the Macan Turbo. The 0.02 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne S is doing 145 km/h against 143 km/h for the Macan Turbo. The gap is 0.07 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne S crosses the line in 12.79 s versus 12.93 s. The 0.15 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 202 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne S finishes in 23.26 s versus 23.62 s, with a 0.36 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (264 vs 264 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Cayenne S and the Macan Turbo are governed to 264 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.59 kg/hp vs 4.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.21 seconds. The 0.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S E3.1 and Macan Turbo 95B.1 are neck and neck (4,63 s vs 4,65 s, no significant gap).
Cayenne S E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne S E3.1: 440 hp, ratio 4,59 kg/hp. Macan Turbo 95B.1: 400 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
Cayenne S E3.1: 264 km/h. Macan Turbo 95B.1: 264 km/h.