Porsche Cayenne S
440 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 6th of 22 in Top speed, 9th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 440 hp
- 550 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.7 s
- VMax 264 km/h
- Cons.
- 12.0 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo
- Displacement
- 2,894 cm³
- ICE power
- 440 hp
- Combined power
- 440 hp
- Combined torque
- 550 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 12.0 L/100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,7 s
- VMax
- 264 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,917 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,893 mm
- Width
- 1,981 mm
- Height
- 1,694 mm
- Boot
- 27 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,020 kg
- Cd
- 0.34
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h). 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW X5 M Competition (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.9 s off the reference BMW X5 M Competition (3.8 s).
Top speed: 264 km/h (6th of 22 in Top speed)
Top speed of 264 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Cayenne S stands against E-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range
Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the E3.1
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S
Continue with the Porsche Cayenne S
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Cayenne S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Cayenne S rank in its segment?
Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the BMW X5 M Competition), 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 9th of 22 in Power-to-weight (218 hp/t, behind the BMW X6 M Competition).
How much does the Cayenne S cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X5 M Competition instead?
The BMW X5 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S vs BMW X5 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.