E3.1 · GENERATION 2019 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne S

440 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 6th of 22 in Top speed, 9th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,63615,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

440hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.7s

VMax 264 km/h

Cons.

12.0L

/100 km

Tank

23.7L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo
Displacement2,894 cm³
Puissance thermique440 hp
Combined power440 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12.0 L/100km
Tank23.7 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,7 s
VMax264 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,917 mm
Wheelbase2,893 mm
Width1,981 mm
Height1,694 mm
Boot27 L
Kerb weight2,020 kg
Cd0.34

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h). 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 0.9 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (3.8 s).

Top speed: 264 km/h (6th of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 264 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne S stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h11e / 22
4,7 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Top speed6e / 22
264 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Power-to-weight9e / 22
218 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 269 hp/t · Bmw X6 M Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range

Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the E3.1

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne S

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne S: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne S ranks 11th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 6th of 22 in Top speed (264 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 9th of 22 in Power-to-weight (218 hp/t, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.