Among the 12 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 4th of 12 in Top speed (264 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (208 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
Porsche Macan Turbo
400 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 12 in Top speed, 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
400hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.7s
VMax 264 km/h
Cons.
12.4L
/100 km
Tank
74.951118L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo
- Displacement
- 3,604 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 406 hp
- Combined power
- 400 hp
- Combined torque
- 550 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 12.4 L/100 km
- Tank
- 74.951118 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,7 s
- VMax
- 264 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,699 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,807 mm
- Width
- 1,933 mm
- Height
- 1,623 mm
- Boot
- 18 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,925 kg
- Cd
- 0.37
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 D-SUV, the Macan Turbo ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s), 4th of 12 in Top speed (264 km/h), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (208 hp/t). 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s), 4th of 12 in Top speed (264 km/h), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (208 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (1st with 283 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 0.9 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).
Top speed: 264 km/h (4th of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 264 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Macan Turbo stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2015–2019.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Macan 95B.1 range
Generation 95B.1 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.1
Popular duels involving the Macan Turbo
Porsche Macan Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan Turbo vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.