Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 gagne (3,84 s vs 4,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 | Macan Turbo 95B.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,84 s−0,81 s | 4,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−0,86 s | 12,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,23 s−1,39 s | 23,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+21 km/h | 264 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 | Macan Turbo 95B.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,91 s | 1,21 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,52 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,72 s | 3,46 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,84 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,17 s | 6,29 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,95 s | 10,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,45 s | 17,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,23 s | 23,62 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 279 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 925 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe hits 100 km/h in 3.84 s versus 4.65 s for the Macan Turbo. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe leads by 0.81 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe is doing 150 km/h against 143 km/h for the Macan Turbo. The gap is 0.66 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe crosses the line in 12.07 s versus 12.93 s. The 0.86 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 206 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe finishes in 22.22 s versus 23.62 s, with a 1.39 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo Coupe is capped at 285 km/h, the Macan Turbo at 264 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.38 kg/hp vs 4.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.21 seconds. The 0.81 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 gagne (3,84 s vs 4,65 s).
Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,84 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 : 520 hp, ratio 4,38 kg/hp. Macan Turbo 95B.1 : 400 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo Coupe E3.1 : 285 km/h. Macan Turbo 95B.1 : 264 km/h.