Among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).
Cayenne Turbo Coupe
520 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 23 in Top speed, 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
520hp
750 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.8s
VMax 285 km/h
Cons.
13.7L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,996 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 549 hp |
| Combined power | 520 hp |
| Combined torque | 750 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 23.7 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,8 s |
| VMax | 285 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,925 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,893 mm |
| Width | 1,981 mm |
| Height | 1,654 mm |
| Boot | 21 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,279 kg |
| Cd | 0.35 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 23 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks (top 2 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t). 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 3.2 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 299 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (3.2 s).
Top speed: 285 km/h (2nd of 23 in Top speed)
Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 299 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Cayenne Turbo Coupe stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 23 E-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range
Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the E3.1
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT leads in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s vs 3.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo Coupe vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.