E3.1 · GENERATION 2020 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne Turbo Coupe

520 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 23 in Top speed, 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,15115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

520hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.8s

VMax 285 km/h

Cons.

13.7L

/100 km

Tank

23.7L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
Displacement3,996 cm³
Puissance thermique549 hp
Combined power520 hp
Combined torque750 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP13.7 L/100km
Tank23.7 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,8 s
VMax285 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,925 mm
Wheelbase2,893 mm
Width1,981 mm
Height1,654 mm
Boot21 L
Kerb weight2,279 kg
Cd0.35

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 23 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks (top 2 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t). 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 3.2 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 299 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (3.2 s).

Top speed: 285 km/h (2nd of 23 in Top speed)

Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 299 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne Turbo Coupe stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 23 E-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.

0–100 km/h2e / 23
3,8 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Top speed2e / 23
285 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 299 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Power-to-weight8e / 23
228 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 282 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range

Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the E3.1

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo Coupe

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Turbo Coupe ranks 2nd of 23 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 2nd of 23 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 8th of 23 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.