Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
ACayennePetrolvsBEQSBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsCayenne · EQS

Porsche Cayenne Turbo S vs Mercedes EQS 450 V297: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2016 vs 2023 · Methodology
PorschePetrolFaster

Cayenne Turbo S

570 hp · 800 Nm · 2,235 kg · 2016

VS
MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 hp · 568 Nm · 2,480 kg · 2023

Result · 0–100 km/h

APorsche Cayenne Turbo S

3.96 s

Gap2.34 sin favour of Cayenne Turbo S
BMercedes EQS 450 V297

6.30 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureCayenne Turbo SEQS 450 V297Gap
0–100 km/h3.96 s6.30 s2.34 s · Cayenne Turbo S
400 m standing start12.12 s14.56 s2.44 s · Cayenne Turbo S
1,000 m standing start22.14 s26.38 s4.24 s · Cayenne Turbo S
Top speed (electronically limited)283 km/h210 km/h73 km/h · Cayenne Turbo S
Power-to-weight ratio3.92 kg/hp7.45 kg/hpbetter ratio · Cayenne Turbo S

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

PorschePetrolCayenne Turbo S
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
MercedesBEVEQS 450 V297
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageCayenne Turbo SEQS 450 V297
0–30 km/h1.04 s1.62 s
0–50 km/h1.73 s2.71 s
0–80 km/h2.97 s4.57 s
0–100 km/h3.96 s6.30 s
0–120 km/h5.30 s8.51 s
0–160 km/h8.67 s15.04 s
0–200 km/h13.88 s25.02 s
400 m standing start12.12 s14.56 s
1,000 m standing start22.14 s26.38 s
Top speed283 km/h210 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Porsche

Cayenne Turbo S

3,92kg/hpratio better by 3,53 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power570 hpV8
Torque800 Nm
Weight2 235 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxTORQUE_CONVERTER
Mercedes

EQS 450 V297

7,45kg/hpcompensated by −245 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power333 hpPending
Torque568 Nm
Weight2 480 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo S hits 100 km/h in 3.96 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. Despite lacking instant torque, 570 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo S leads by 2.34 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S is doing 152 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 1.64 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo S crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 14.56 s. The 2.45 s gap represents roughly 103 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S finishes in 22.13 s versus 26.37 s, with a 4.24 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo S is capped at 283 km/h, the EQS 450 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 2.34 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

RS Q8 SUV vs Cayenne Turbo S

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

PorscheVSBMW

Cayenne Turbo S vs X5 M50i

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo S wins (3,96 s vs 6,30 s).

Cayenne Turbo S goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,96 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Cayenne Turbo S: 570 hp, ratio 3,92 kg/hp. EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp.

Cayenne Turbo S: 283 km/h. EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h.