Among the 3 limousines electric 2021–2025, the EQS 450 ranks WLTP range (695 km, behind the Mercedes EQS 450), DC charge power (200 kW, behind the Mercedes EQS 450), 0–100 km/h (6.2 s, behind the BMW i7 M70 xDrive).
V297 · GENERATION 2023 → · LIMOUSINE
MercedesBEV
EQS 450
333 hp, 695 km range, 6,2 s 0-100 : among the 3 limousines electric 2021–2025, the EQS 450 ranks WLTP range, DC charge power, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
333hp
568 Nm · 333 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.2s
VMax 210 km/h
Range
695km
WLTP
DC charging
200kW
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes EQS 450
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 333 hp |
| Combined power | 333 hp |
| Couple | 568 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 107.8 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 695 km |
| Charge DC max | 200 kW |
| Charge time 10→80 % | 31 min |
| Conso élec WLTP | 18.3 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,2 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 2,480 kg |
| Cd | 0.2 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 3 limousines electric, the EQS 450 ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. WLTP range (695 km), DC charge power (200 kW).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW i7 M70 xDrive (1st with 3.7 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 695 km WLTP (WLTP range)
The EQS 450 offers 695 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (695 km).
Charging: 200 kW DC (DC charge power)
The EQS 450 accepts up to 200 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (200 kW).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the EQS 450 stands against limousines electric
Comparison across 3 limousines electric marketed between 2021–2025.
WLTP range1e / 3
695 km
Min 560 km · BMW i7 M70 xDriveMax 695 km · Mercedes EQS 450
DC charge power1e / 2
200 kW
Min 195 kW · Bmw i7 xDrive60Max 200 kW · Mercedes EQS 450
0–100 km/h3e / 3
6,2 s
Min 6,2 s · Mercedes EQS 450Max 3,7 s · BMW i7 M70 xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
i7 xDrive60544 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
i7 M70 xDrive659 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
840i333 hp · 0-100 5.2 s
840i333 hp · 0-100 5.2 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the EQS 450
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes EQS 450: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
695 km WLTP announced — making it the autonomie du segment out of 3 models. The reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (695 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.