Over 0–100 km/h, Cayman (Manual) 987 wins (5,65 s vs 7,37 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayman (Manual) 987 | 220i Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,65 s−1,72 s | 7,37 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,79 s−1,68 s | 15,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s−3,33 s | 28,02 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 267 km/h+38 km/h | 229 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,94 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayman (Manual) 987 | 220i Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,35 s | 3,10 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,33 s | 5,32 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,65 s | 7,37 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,58 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,00 s | 17,94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,16 s | 33,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,79 s | 15,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s | 28,02 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 330 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed Steptronic with double clutch |
Off the line, the Cayman (Manual) hits 100 km/h in 5.65 s versus 7.37 s for the Bmw 220i Active Tourer. At this point, the Cayman (Manual) leads by 1.72 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayman (Manual) is doing 135 km/h against 121 km/h for the Bmw 220i Active Tourer. The gap is 1.05 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayman (Manual) crosses the line in 13.79 s versus 15.46 s. The 1.68 s gap represents roughly 68 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayman (Manual) continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 168 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayman (Manual) finishes in 24.69 s versus 28.02 s, with a 3.33 s lead.
Electronically capped at 229 km/h, the Bmw 220i Active Tourer never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.94 kg/hp vs 7.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.62 seconds. The 1.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayman (Manual) 987 wins (5,65 s vs 7,37 s).
Cayman (Manual) 987 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,65 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayman (Manual) 987: 269 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp. 220i Active Tourer F44: 178 hp, ratio 7,95 kg/hp.
Cayman (Manual) 987: 267 km/h. 220i Active Tourer F44: 229 km/h.