Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 8,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.2 | CR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s−2,38 s | 8,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−1,94 s | 16,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s−2,94 s | 29,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+29 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.2 | CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 2,53 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,41 s | 6,22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s | 8,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,77 s | 11,62 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,99 s | 21,69 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,23 s | 84,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 16,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 29,78 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 859 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 660 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | CVT |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.29 s versus 8.67 s for the CR-V. At this point, the Macan leads by 2.38 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 125 km/h against 116 km/h for the CR-V. The gap is 1.55 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 16.50 s. The 1.94 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.84 s versus 29.77 s, with a 2.94 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan is capped at 229 km/h, the CR-V at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.59 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.59 seconds. The 2.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 8,67 s).
Macan 95B.2 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan 95B.2 : 245 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp. CR-V : 190 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.2 : 229 km/h. CR-V : 200 km/h.