Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 gagne (6,47 s vs 7,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.3 | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s−1,11 s | 7,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s−0,92 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s−2,16 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+29 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.3 | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,68 s | 1,62 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,81 s | 2,72 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,68 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,70 s | 10,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,31 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,71 s | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.47 s versus 7.58 s for the Compass 4xe. Despite lacking instant torque, 252 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Macan leads by 1.11 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 127 km/h against 116 km/h for the Compass 4xe. The gap is 0.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.70 s versus 15.62 s. The 0.92 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.72 s versus 28.87 s, with a 2.16 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan is capped at 232 km/h, the Compass 4xe at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 1.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 gagne (6,47 s vs 7,58 s).
Macan 95B.3 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,47 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan 95B.3 : 252 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp. Compass 4xe : 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.3 : 229 km/h. Compass 4xe : 200 km/h.