Over 0–100 km/h, Macan Turbo 95B.1 wins (4,65 s vs 7,80 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan Turbo 95B.1 | X2 sDrive20i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,65 s−3,15 s | 7,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,94 s−2,80 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s−4,77 s | 28,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h+37 km/h | 227 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan Turbo 95B.1 | X2 sDrive20i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,21 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,02 s | 3,30 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,46 s | 5,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,65 s | 7,80 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,29 s | 10,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,49 s | 18,58 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,41 s | 34,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,94 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s | 28,39 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 227 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 925 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 460 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed Steptronic with double clutch |
Off the line, the Macan Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.65 s versus 7.80 s for the X2 sDrive20i. At this point, the Macan Turbo leads by 3.15 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan Turbo is doing 143 km/h against 120 km/h for the X2 sDrive20i. The gap is 1.94 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan Turbo crosses the line in 12.93 s versus 15.74 s. The 2.80 s gap represents roughly 110 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan Turbo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan Turbo finishes in 23.62 s versus 28.39 s, with a 4.77 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan Turbo is capped at 264 km/h, the X2 sDrive20i at 227 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.09 seconds. The 3.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan Turbo 95B.1 wins (4,65 s vs 7,80 s).
Macan Turbo 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,65 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan Turbo 95B.1: 400 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. X2 sDrive20i F39: 192 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
Macan Turbo 95B.1: 264 km/h. X2 sDrive20i F39: 227 km/h.