Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 gagne (3,24 s vs 3,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 | Model S Long Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,24 s−0,05 s | 3,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,27 s | 11,12 s+0,15 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,55 s | 20,17 s+0,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,52 kg/hp | 3,09 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 | Model S Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,91 s | 0,94 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,51 s | 1,56 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,42 s | 2,51 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,24 s | 3,29 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,29 s | 4,25 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,13 s | 6,77 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,11 s | 10,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,27 s | 11,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,55 s | 20,17 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 357 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed front / Two-speed dog-ring rear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 908 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 069 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo hits 100 km/h in 3.24 s versus 3.29 s for the Model S Long Range. The 0.05 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model S Long Range is doing 167 km/h against 162 km/h for the Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Long Range crosses the line in 11.11 s versus 11.26 s. The 0.15 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 236 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Long Range finishes in 20.17 s versus 20.55 s, with a 0.38 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo and the Model S Long Range are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.52 kg/hp vs 3.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.93 seconds. The 0.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 gagne (3,24 s vs 3,29 s).
Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,24 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 : 670 hp, ratio 3,52 kg/hp. Model S Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,09 kg/hp.
Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo J1.1 : 250 km/h. Model S Long Range : 250 km/h.