Over 0–100 km/h, Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 wins (9,17 s vs 10,38 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 | 116d F40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,17 s−1,21 s | 10,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,86 s−0,76 s | 17,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,94 s−1,88 s | 31,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+10 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 11,85 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 | 116d F40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,55 s | 2,52 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,24 s | 4,14 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,87 s | 7,32 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,17 s | 10,38 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 12,14 s | 14,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,25 s | 27,75 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,38 s | 75,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,86 s | 17,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,94 s | 31,82 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 196 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 7-speed (dual clutch) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 375 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual (seven-speed Steptronic dual-clutch transmission) |
Off the line, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 hits 100 km/h in 9.17 s versus 10.38 s for the Bmw 116d. At this point, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 leads by 1.21 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 is doing 115 km/h against 107 km/h for the Bmw 116d. The gap is 0.31 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 crosses the line in 16.85 s versus 17.61 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 161 km/h versus 148 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 finishes in 29.94 s versus 31.81 s, with a 1.88 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (210 vs 200 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 is capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw 116d at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.54 kg/hp vs 11.85 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.96 seconds. The 1.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 wins (9,17 s vs 10,38 s).
Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 9,17 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140: 140 hp, ratio 8,54 kg/hp. 116d F40: 116 hp, ratio 11,85 kg/hp.
Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140: 210 km/h. 116d F40: 200 km/h.