Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140

Petrolcity carGENERATION V, 2020

140 hp, 9,1 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 ranks 8th of 11 in Combined consumption, 1st of 5 in Tank range, 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
140 hp
240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.1 s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
5.7 L
/100 km
Tank
45 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
Inline · 4 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement
1 cm³
Power
140 hp
Couple
240 Nm
Gearbox
Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Traction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.7 L/100 km
Tank
45 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
9,1 s
VMax
210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,050 mm
Wheelbase
2,583 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
1,440 mm
Kerb weight
1,196 kg
Cd
0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 14 city cars, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 5 in Tank range (789 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris (1st with 5.5 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (8th of 11 in Combined consumption)

The Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 789 km (1st of 5 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 covers 789 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 789 km.

Where the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 stands against city cars

Comparison across 14 city cars marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption8e / 11
5.7 L/100
Min 7.1 L/100 · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Tank range1e / 5
789 km
Min 620 km · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 789 km · Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140
0–100 km/h8e / 14
9,1 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,5 s · Toyota GR Yaris

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Renault Clio V range

Generation V launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the V

Popular duels involving the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140

Continue with the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140

The same car, from other angles.

Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 rank in its segment?

Among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 ranks 8th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 1st of 5 in Tank range (789 km, behind the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140), 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (9.1 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).

What is the range of the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140?

789 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 5 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG instead?

The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.