Over 0–100 km/h, 230i F22 wins (5,51 s vs 5,80 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Megane 4 RS 280 | 230i F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,80 s | 5,51 s+0,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s−0,01 s | 13,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,70 s−0,58 s | 25,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,67 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Megane 4 RS 280 | 230i F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,67 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,79 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,37 s | 3,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,80 s | 5,51 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,41 s | 7,53 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,96 s | 13,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,08 s | 22,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 13,88 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,70 s | 25,28 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 430 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 230i hits 100 km/h in 5.51 s versus 5.80 s for the Megane 4 RS 280. At this point, the Bmw 230i leads by 0.29 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 230i is doing 133 km/h against 138 km/h for the Megane 4 RS 280. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Megane 4 RS 280 crosses the line in 13.86 s versus 13.87 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, the Megane 4 RS 280 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 194 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane 4 RS 280 finishes in 24.70 s versus 25.28 s, with a 0.58 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Megane 4 RS 280 and the Bmw 230i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.18 kg/hp vs 5.67 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.62 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 230i F22 wins (5,51 s vs 5,80 s).
Megane 4 RS 280 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,80 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Megane 4 RS 280: 280 hp, ratio 5,18 kg/hp. 230i F22: 252 hp, ratio 5,67 kg/hp.
Megane 4 RS 280: 250 km/h. 230i F22: 250 km/h.