Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,29 s vs 6,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Performance | Model Y Juniper RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s−2,75 s | 6,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s−2,76 s | 14,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s−4,37 s | 25,58 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+52 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,20 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Performance | Model Y Juniper RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,74 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,49 s | 2,91 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,44 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s | 6,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,37 s | 7,80 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,66 s | 13,29 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,53 s | 22,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s | 14,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s | 25,58 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 698 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 836 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 419 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 853 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.29 s versus 6.04 s for the Model Y Juniper RWD. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 2.75 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 157 km/h against 135 km/h for the Model Y Juniper RWD. The gap is 2.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.49 s versus 14.24 s. The 2.76 s gap represents roughly 121 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 185 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 21.21 s versus 25.58 s, with a 4.37 s lead.
The Model 3 Performance features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Model Y Juniper RWD’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the Model Y Juniper RWD at 209 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.03 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.90 seconds. The 2.75 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,29 s vs 6,04 s).
Model 3 Performance passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model 3 Performance : 456 hp, ratio 4,03 kg/hp. Model Y Juniper RWD : 299 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance : 261 km/h. Model Y Juniper RWD : 209 km/h.