Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 RWD wins (6,00 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 RWD | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−0,89 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,23 s−0,77 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,66 s−2,06 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 201 km/h | 226 km/h−25 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,21 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 RWD | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,65 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,76 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,49 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 6,89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,92 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,46 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,08 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,23 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,66 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed | 201 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 282 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 461 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 752 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Model 3 RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 461 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the Q7 SUV is 4 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 RWD is doing 133 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.22 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 RWD crosses the line in 14.23 s versus 15.00 s. The 0.77 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 185 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 RWD finishes in 25.66 s versus 27.71 s, with a 2.05 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (226 km/h), the Q7 SUV never recovers its launch deficit.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Model 3 RWD’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 RWD is capped at 201 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 0.89 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 RWD wins (6,00 s vs 6,89 s).
Model 3 RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 RWD: 282 hp, ratio 6,21 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
Model 3 RWD: 201 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.