Over 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance wins (2,53 s vs 3,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model S Performance | AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s−0,83 s | 3,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,32 s−0,70 s | 11,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,02 s−0,71 s | 19,73 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h | 270 km/h−8 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,89 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,22 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model S Performance | AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,71 s | 0,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,18 s | 1,54 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 1,91 s | 2,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s | 3,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,31 s | 4,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,58 s | 6,62 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,76 s | 9,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,32 s | 11,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,02 s | 19,73 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 270 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 250 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 680 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1020 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 190 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model S Performance hits 100 km/h in 2.53 s versus 3.36 s for the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell. At this point, the Model S Performance leads by 0.83 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model S Performance is doing 175 km/h against 169 km/h for the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell. The gap is 0.62 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Performance crosses the line in 10.31 s versus 11.02 s. The 0.70 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 244 km/h versus 241 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Performance finishes in 19.02 s versus 19.73 s, with a 0.71 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (262 vs 270 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model S Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell at 270 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.89 kg/hp vs 3.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.73 seconds. The 0.83 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance wins (2,53 s vs 3,36 s).
Model S Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,53 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model S Performance: 778 hp, ratio 2,89 kg/hp. AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206: 680 hp, ratio 3,22 kg/hp.
Model S Performance: 262 km/h. AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206: 270 km/h.