Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 90D gagne (5,03 s vs 9,16 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X 90D | Q3 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,03 s−4,13 s | 9,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,07 s−3,86 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s−7,53 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 249 km/h+40 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X 90D | Q3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,49 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,49 s | 3,65 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,99 s | 6,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,03 s | 9,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 13,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,16 s | 25,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,94 s | 54,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,07 s | 16,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s | 30,85 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 532 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 441 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 560 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Model X 90D hits 100 km/h in 5.03 s versus 9.16 s for the Q3 SUV. The instant torque of 967 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model X 90D leads by 4.13 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X 90D is doing 147 km/h against 111 km/h for the Q3 SUV. The gap is 2.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X 90D crosses the line in 13.07 s versus 16.93 s. The 3.86 s gap represents roughly 135 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X 90D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 151 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X 90D finishes in 23.32 s versus 30.84 s, with a 7.53 s lead.
The Model X 90D features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q3 SUV’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X 90D is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q3 SUV at 209 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.01 seconds. The 4.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 90D gagne (5,03 s vs 9,16 s).
Model X 90D passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,03 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X 90D : 532 hp, ratio 4,59 kg/hp. Q3 SUV : 150 hp, ratio 10,40 kg/hp.
Model X 90D : 249 km/h. Q3 SUV : 209 km/h.