Audi Q3 SUV
150 hp, 9,1 s 0-100 : among the 10 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 SUV ranks 3rd of 10 in Combined consumption, 4th of 10 in Tank range, 8th of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 150 hp
- 250 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.1 s
- VMax 209 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 55 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,498 cm³
- Power
- 150 hp
- Couple
- 250 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 55 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,1 s
- VMax
- 209 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,531 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,678 mm
- Width
- 1,859 mm
- Height
- 1,588 mm
- Boot
- 488 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,560 kg
- Cd
- 0.3
- CO₂ WLTP
- 151 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 10 C-SUV, the Q3 SUV ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
C-SUV among the best in segment: 3rd of 10 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100), 4th of 10 in Tank range (833 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X1 sDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi Q3 Sportback (1st with 948 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 10 in Combined consumption)
The Q3 SUV consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X1 sDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 833 km (4th of 10 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Q3 SUV covers 833 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 948 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Q3 SUV stands against C-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi Q3 F3 range
Generation F3 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F3
Popular duels involving the Q3 SUV
Continue with the Audi Q3 SUV
The same car, from other angles.
Audi Q3 SUV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Q3 SUV rank in its segment?
Among the 10 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 SUV ranks 3rd of 10 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the BMW X1 sDrive20d), 4th of 10 in Tank range (833 km, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback), 8th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (9.1 s, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback).
What is the range of the Q3 SUV?
833 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 10 in Tank range.
How much does the Q3 SUV cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X1 sDrive20d instead?
The BMW X1 sDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q3 SUV vs BMW X1 sDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.