Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X P90D gagne (3,32 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X P90D | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,32 s−3,57 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,18 s−3,82 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,35 s−7,37 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,24 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X P90D | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,98 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,63 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,62 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,32 s | 6,89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,21 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,81 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,57 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,18 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,35 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 762 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 468 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Model X P90D hits 100 km/h in 3.32 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 967 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model X P90D leads by 3.57 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X P90D is doing 166 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 2.31 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X P90D crosses the line in 11.18 s versus 15.00 s. The 3.82 s gap represents roughly 147 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X P90D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X P90D finishes in 20.35 s versus 27.71 s, with a 7.36 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X P90D is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 3.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X P90D gagne (3,32 s vs 6,89 s).
Model X P90D passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,32 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X P90D : 762 hp, ratio 3,24 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
Model X P90D : 250 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.