Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 5,13 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Performance | Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s−2,08 s | 5,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−2,39 s | 13,31 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s−4,18 s | 24,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+52 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,43 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Performance | Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,50 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,48 s | 2,50 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 6,55 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,45 s | 10,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,08 s | 17,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 13,31 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s | 24,10 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 428 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 5.13 s for the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 2.08 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 143 km/h for the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW. The gap is 1.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 13.30 s. The 2.39 s gap represents roughly 111 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 24.10 s, with a 4.18 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 5.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.43 seconds. The 2.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 5,13 s).
Model X Performance passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,05 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Performance : 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW : 428 hp, ratio 5,43 kg/hp.
Model X Performance : 262 km/h. Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW : 210 km/h.