Electricfamily SUVGENERATION GY, 2025

Audi Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW

428 hp, 542 km range, 5,1 s 0-100 : among the 15 D-SUV electric 2023–2027, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW ranks 8th of 15 in WLTP range, 5th of 12 in DC charge power, 12th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power

428hp

855 Nm, dont 428 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

5.1s

VMax 210 km/h

Range

542km

WLTP

DC charging

270kW

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique
428 hp
Combined power
428 hp
Couple
855 Nm
Gearbox
Mono-rapport 1 rapports
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity
94.9 kWh
Range WLTP
542 km
Charge AC max
11 kW
Charge DC max
270 kW
Charge time 10→80 %
21 min

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
5,1 s
VMax
210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,771 mm
Wheelbase
2,899 mm
Width
1,939 mm
Height
1,648 mm
Boot
526 L
Kerb weight
2,325 kg
Cd
0.3
CO₂ WLTP
0 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 15 D-SUV electric, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 713 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 330 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 542 km WLTP (8th of 15 in WLTP range)

The Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW offers 542 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).

Charging: 270 kW DC (5th of 12 in DC charge power)

The Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW accepts up to 270 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (330 kW).

Where the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW stands against D-SUV electric

Comparison across 15 D-SUV electric marketed between 2023–2027.

WLTP range8e / 15
542 km
Min 443 km · Audi SQ6 SUV e-tronMax 713 km · Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
DC charge power5e / 12
270 kW
Min 215 kW · Xpeng G6Max 330 kW · Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
0–100 km/h12e / 15
5,1 s
Min 6,7 s · Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronMax 3,5 s · Kia EV6 GT AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Audi Q6 GY range

Generation GY launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the GY

Popular duels involving the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW

Audi Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 15 D-SUV electric 2023–2027, the Q6 SUV e-tron quattro 315 kW ranks 8th of 15 in WLTP range (542 km, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 5th of 12 in DC charge power (270 kW, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 12th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (5.1 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).

542 km WLTP announced - making it the 8th of 15 in autonomie du segment out of 15 models. The reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.