Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 6,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Performance | EQS 450 V297 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s−3,25 s | 6,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−3,64 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s−6,46 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+52 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Performance | EQS 450 V297 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,48 s | 2,71 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,57 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s | 6,30 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,45 s | 15,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,08 s | 25,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 3.25 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 2.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 14.56 s. The 3.64 s gap represents roughly 150 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 26.37 s, with a 6.45 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the EQS 450 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 7.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 3.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 6,30 s).
Model X Performance passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,05 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Performance : 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. EQS 450 V297 : 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp.
Model X Performance : 262 km/h. EQS 450 V297 : 210 km/h.