Sur 0–100 km/h, RAV4 PHEV gagne (6,08 s vs 7,41 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RAV4 PHEV | Atto 3 Extended Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,08 s−1,33 s | 7,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,33 s−1,24 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,91 s−3,29 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h+104 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,50 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RAV4 PHEV | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,58 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,57 s | 3,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,47 s | 5,43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,08 s | 7,41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,33 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,97 s | 19,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,37 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,33 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,91 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp | Inline-4 A25A-FXS (Dynamic Force, Atkinson cycle) |
| Torque | 389 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 990 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Hybrid Synergy Drive) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the RAV4 PHEV hits 100 km/h in 6.08 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. At this point, the RAV4 PHEV leads by 1.33 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RAV4 PHEV is doing 129 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 0.83 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RAV4 PHEV crosses the line in 14.33 s versus 15.57 s. The 1.24 s gap represents roughly 50 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RAV4 PHEV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 181 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RAV4 PHEV finishes in 25.91 s versus 29.19 s, with a 3.29 s lead.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.50 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 1.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RAV4 PHEV gagne (6,08 s vs 7,41 s).
RAV4 PHEV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,08 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RAV4 PHEV : 306 hp, ratio 6,50 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range : 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
RAV4 PHEV : 264 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range : 160 km/h.