Sur 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 gagne (8,23 s vs 8,62 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | 118d xDrive F20LCI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s−0,39 s | 8,62 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s−0,18 s | 16,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s−0,48 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 210 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,80 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | 118d xDrive F20LCI |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,80 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 3,05 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 5,89 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 12,06 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 23,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 52,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 16,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | 2 |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | — |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the XC40 B4 hits 100 km/h in 8.23 s versus 8.62 s for the Bmw 118d xDrive. The 0.39 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the XC40 B4 is doing 115 km/h against 112 km/h for the Bmw 118d xDrive. The gap is 0.04 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the XC40 B4 crosses the line in 16.10 s versus 16.28 s. The 0.18 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the XC40 B4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 158 km/h versus 155 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the XC40 B4 finishes in 29.39 s versus 29.87 s, with a 0.48 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (210 km/h), the Bmw 118d xDrive never recovers its launch deficit.
The Bmw 118d xDrive features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the XC40 B4’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 118d xDrive at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 9.80 kg/hp) and transmission (auto vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.20 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 gagne (8,23 s vs 8,62 s).
XC40 B4 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,23 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. 118d xDrive F20LCI : 150 hp, ratio 9,80 kg/hp.
XC40 B4 : 180 km/h. 118d xDrive F20LCI : 210 km/h.