Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (7,07 s vs 8,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G9 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 7,07 s+1,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 15,11 s+1,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 28,09 s+0,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 226 km/h−26 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G9 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,41 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,03 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,49 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,09 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,51 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,05 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 7.07 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. Despite lacking instant torque, 231 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 1.44 s and sits roughly 36 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 117 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 1.36 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 16.32 s. The 1.21 s gap represents roughly 49 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The G9 maxes out at 200 km/h while the Q7 SUV keeps accelerating towards 226 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 1.02 s from 1.21 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 28.09 s versus 28.71 s, with just 0.62 s to spare. The G9 fails to fully close the launch gap.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the G9’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G9 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.63 seconds. The 1.44 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (7,07 s vs 8,51 s).
G9 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,51 secondes (simulation calibrée).
G9 : 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
G9 : 200 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.