Over 0–100 km/h, G9 wins (8,51 s vs 8,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G9 | 600e 156 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s−0,41 s | 8,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s−0,41 s | 16,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s−2,52 s | 31,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+50 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,06 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G9 | 600e 156 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,41 s | 2,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,03 s | 3,98 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,49 s | 6,56 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 8,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,09 s | 12,08 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,51 s | - |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,05 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 16,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 31,23 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reducer (BEV) |
Off the line, the G9 hits 100 km/h in 8.51 s versus 8.92 s for the 600e 156. The 0.41 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the G9 is doing 120 km/h against 115 km/h for the 600e 156. The gap is 0.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the G9 crosses the line in 16.32 s versus 16.73 s. The 0.41 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the G9 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 169 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G9 finishes in 28.71 s versus 31.23 s, with a 2.52 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G9 is capped at 200 km/h, the 600e 156 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 10.06 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.15 seconds. The 0.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, G9 wins (8,51 s vs 8,92 s).
G9 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,51 seconds (calibrated simulation).
G9: 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. 600e 156: 156 hp, ratio 10,06 kg/hp.
G9: 200 km/h. 600e 156: 150 km/h.