Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 and 220i F22 are neck and neck (7,45 s vs 7,48 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| MONA M03 | 220i F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s−0,03 s | 7,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s−0,05 s | 15,53 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s−0,23 s | 27,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 229 km/h−29 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,60 kg/hp | 7,32 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | MONA M03 | 220i F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,16 s | 2,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,61 s | 3,53 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,80 s | 5,65 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s | 7,48 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,58 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,40 s | 16,83 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,72 s | 30,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 15,53 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s | 27,74 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 405 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed Steptronic with double clutch |
Off the line, the MONA M03 hits 100 km/h in 7.45 s versus 7.48 s for the Bmw 220i. The instant torque of 240 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 220i is doing 124 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the MONA M03 crosses the line in 15.48 s versus 15.53 s. The 0.05 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the MONA M03 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 27.73 s, with a 0.23 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (229 km/h), the Bmw 220i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MONA M03 is capped at 200 km/h, the Bmw 220i at 229 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.25 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 and 220i F22 are neck and neck (7,45 s vs 7,48 s, no significant gap).
MONA M03 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,45 seconds (calibrated simulation).
MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp. 220i F22: 192 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp.
MONA M03: 200 km/h. 220i F22: 229 km/h.