Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 wins (7,45 s vs 7,88 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | MONA M03 | ID.3 Pro S | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.45 s | 7.88 s | 0.43 s · MONA M03 |
| 400 m standing start | 15.48 s | 15.92 s | 0.44 s · MONA M03 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.51 s | 29.62 s | 2.11 s · MONA M03 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 160 km/h | 40 km/h · MONA M03 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.60 kg/hp | 9.46 kg/hp | better ratio · MONA M03 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | MONA M03 | ID.3 Pro S |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.16 s | 2.02 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.61 s | 3.38 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.80 s | 5.70 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.45 s | 7.88 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9.58 s | 10.75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16.40 s | 20.40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27.72 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15.48 s | 15.92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.51 s | 29.62 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the MONA M03 hits 100 km/h in 7.45 s versus 7.88 s for the ID.3 Pro S. Despite the faster sprint time, the ID.3 Pro S is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the MONA M03 is doing 126 km/h against 118 km/h for the ID.3 Pro S. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the MONA M03 crosses the line in 15.48 s versus 15.91 s. The 0.43 s gap represents roughly 17 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the MONA M03 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 29.62 s, with a 2.11 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MONA M03 is capped at 200 km/h, the ID.3 Pro S at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.60 kg/hp vs 9.46 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.58 seconds. The 0.43 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 wins (7,45 s vs 7,88 s).
MONA M03 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,45 seconds (calibrated simulation).
MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp. ID.3 Pro S: 204 hp, ratio 9,46 kg/hp.
MONA M03: 200 km/h. ID.3 Pro S: 160 km/h.