Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AMONAvsBCooperBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMONA · Cooper

Xpeng MONA M03 vs MINI Cooper SE FWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact · 2024 vs 2021 · Methodology
XpengBEV

MONA M03

208 hp · 240 Nm · 1,581 kg · 2024

VS
MINIBEVFaster

Cooper SE FWD

184 hp · 270 Nm · 1,365 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

AXpeng MONA M03

7.45 s

Gap0.13 sin favour of Cooper SE FWD
BMINI Cooper SE FWD

7.32 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureMONA M03Cooper SE FWDGap
0–100 km/h7.45 s7.32 s0.13 s · Cooper SE FWD
400 m standing start15.48 s15.46 s0.02 s · Cooper SE FWD
1,000 m standing start27.51 s29.86 s2.35 s · MONA M03
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h150 km/h50 km/h · MONA M03
Power-to-weight ratio7.60 kg/hp7.42 kg/hpbetter ratio · Cooper SE FWD

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

XpengBEVMONA M03
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
MINIBEVCooper SE FWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageMONA M03Cooper SE FWD
0–30 km/h2.16 s2.03 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h3.61 s3.40 s
0–80 km/h5.80 s5.51 s
0–100 km/h7.45 s7.32 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h9.58 s · tight gap9.71 s
0–160 km/h16.40 s-
0–200 km/h27.72 s-
400 m standing start15.48 s15.46 s · tight gap
1,000 m standing start27.51 s29.86 s
Top speed200 km/h150 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Xpeng

MONA M03

7,60kg/hpcompensated by −216 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power208 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque240 Nm
Weight1 581 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
MINI

Cooper SE FWD

7,42kg/hpratio better by 0,18 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power184 hpPending
Torque270 Nm
Weight1 365 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Cooper SE FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.32 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. At this point, the Cooper SE FWD leads by 0.13 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Cooper SE FWD is doing 124 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.14 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper SE FWD crosses the line in 15.46 s versus 15.48 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Cooper SE FWD maxes out at 150 km/h while the MONA M03 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.43 s.

Around 419 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the MONA M03 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 50 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 29.86 s. The 2.35 s delta in favour of the MONA M03 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MONA M03 is capped at 200 km/h, the Cooper SE FWD at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.60 kg/hp vs 7.42 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.21 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Cooper SE FWD
BMW i3s

Other duels you might be interested in

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro

MINIVSBMW

Cooper SE FWD vs i3

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro S

BYDVSMINI

Dolphin Boost 150kW vs Cooper SE FWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Cooper SE FWD wins (7,32 s vs 7,45 s).

MONA M03 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,45 seconds (calibrated simulation).

MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp. Cooper SE FWD: 184 hp, ratio 7,42 kg/hp.

MONA M03: 200 km/h. Cooper SE FWD: 150 km/h.