Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (4,21 s vs 6,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| P7 | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s−2,37 s | 6,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s−2,26 s | 14,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s−2,39 s | 27,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | P7 | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,75 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 2,93 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 4,84 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,64 s | 8,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,67 s | 15,66 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 14,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 27,64 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 6.58 s for the P7. At this point, the P7 leads by 2.37 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 127 km/h for the P7. The gap is 1.63 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 14.81 s. The 2.27 s gap represents roughly 95 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the P7 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 170 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the P7 finishes in 25.24 s versus 27.64 s, with a 2.40 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (170 vs 170 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The P7 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the P7’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the P7 and the P7 are governed to 170 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.18 seconds. The 2.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (4,21 s vs 6,58 s).
P7 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,21 secondes (simulation calibrée).
P7 : 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. P7 : 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.
P7 : 170 km/h. P7 : 170 km/h.