Xpeng P7

ElectricsaloonGENERATION Gen I, 2020

263 hp, 480 km range, 6,7 s 0-100 : among the 11 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 10 in WLTP range, 7th of 8 in DC charge power, 11th of 11 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
263 hp
390 Nm, dont 266 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.7 s
VMax 170 km/h
Range
480 km
WLTP
DC charging
80 kW

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Electric power
266 hp
Combined power
263 hp
Couple
390 Nm
Gearbox
Mono-rapport Automatique
Transmission
Propulsion

Battery and charging

Battery capacity
75 kWh
Range WLTP
480 km
Charge AC max
11 kW
Charge DC max
80 kW
EV cons. WLTP
16.8 kWh/100 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
6,7 s
VMax
170 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width
1,896 mm
Height
1,450 mm
Kerb weight
1,995 kg
Cd
0.236

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 11 saloons electric, the P7 ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 629 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 480 km WLTP (7th of 10 in WLTP range)

The P7 offers 480 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).

Charging: 80 kW DC (7th of 8 in DC charge power)

The P7 accepts up to 80 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (250 kW).

Where the P7 stands against saloons electric

Comparison across 11 saloons electric marketed between 2018–2022.
WLTP range7e / 10
480 km
Min 409 km · Tesla Model 3 Standard Range PlusMax 629 km · Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD
DC charge power7e / 8
80 kW
Min 80 kW · Xpeng P7Max 250 kW · Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD
0–100 km/h11e / 11
6,7 s
Min 6,7 s · Xpeng P7Max 3,3 s · Tesla Model 3 Performance

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Xpeng P7 Gen I range

Generation Gen I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the Gen I

Popular duels involving the P7

Continue with the Xpeng P7

The same car, from other angles.

Xpeng P7: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the P7 rank in its segment?

Among the 11 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 10 in WLTP range (480 km, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 7th of 8 in DC charge power (80 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 11th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s, behind the Tesla Model 3 Performance).

What is the WLTP range of the P7?

480 km WLTP announced - making it the 7th of 10 in WLTP range out of 10 models. The reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).

How much does the P7 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD instead?

The Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD leads in WLTP range (629 km vs 480 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the P7 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.