Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /MPV
AX9BEVvsB216dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX9 · 216d

Xpeng X9 vs BMW 216d Gran Tourer F22: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

MPV · 2024 vs 2018 · Methodology
XpengBEVFaster

X9

543 hp · 717 Nm · 2,630 kg · 2024

VS
BMWDiesel

216d Gran Tourer F22

116 hp · 270 Nm · 1,480 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AXpeng X9

3.88 s

Gap7.48 sin favour of X9
BBMW 216d Gran Tourer F22

11.36 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX9216d Gran Tourer F22Gap
0–100 km/h3.88 s11.36 s7.48 s · X9
400 m standing start11.34 s18.06 s6.72 s · X9
1,000 m standing start22.14 s32.93 s10.79 s · X9
Top speed (electronically limited)200 km/h192 km/h8 km/h · X9
Power-to-weight ratio4.84 kg/hp12.76 kg/hpbetter ratio · X9

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

XpengBEVX9
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWDiesel216d Gran Tourer F22
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageX9216d Gran Tourer F22
0–30 km/h1.15 s2.34 s
0–50 km/h1.92 s4.04 s
0–80 km/h3.09 s7.84 s
0–100 km/h3.88 s11.36 s
0–120 km/h4.68 s16.16 s
0–160 km/h6.72 s33.00 s
0–200 km/h9.78 s-
400 m standing start11.34 s18.06 s
1,000 m standing start22.14 s32.93 s
Top speed200 km/h192 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Xpeng

X9

4,84kg/hpratio better by 7,92 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power543 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD MPV
Torque717 Nm
Weight2 630 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
BMW

216d Gran Tourer F22

12,76kg/hpcompensated by −1 150 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power116 hp3 cyl
Torque270 Nm
Weight1 480 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch)

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X9 hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 11.36 s for the 216d Gran Tourer. The instant torque of 717 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the X9 leads by 7.48 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X9 is doing 173 km/h against 102 km/h for the 216d Gran Tourer. The gap is 4.19 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the X9 crosses the line in 11.34 s versus 18.06 s. The 6.72 s gap represents roughly 213 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the X9 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 141 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X9 finishes in 22.13 s versus 32.93 s, with a 10.80 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 192 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The X9 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 216d Gran Tourer’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X9 is capped at 200 km/h, the 216d Gran Tourer at 192 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 19.19 seconds. The 7.48 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of X9
Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC
Instead of 216d Gran Tourer F22
BMW 216i Active TourerBMW 216i Gran TourerBMW 216i Gran Tourer

Other duels you might be interested in

XpengVSMercedes

X9 vs V 300 d 4MATIC

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 216d Gran Tourer

XpengVSMercedes

X9 vs V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

BMWVSCitroen

216d Gran Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, X9 wins (3,88 s vs 11,36 s).

X9 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).

X9: 543 hp, ratio 4,84 kg/hp. 216d Gran Tourer F22: 116 hp, ratio 12,76 kg/hp.

X9: 200 km/h. 216d Gran Tourer F22: 192 km/h.