Among the 25 M 2016–2020, the 216d Gran Tourer ranks 5th of 25 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 5th of 25 in Tank range (1159 km, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 23th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (11.5 s, behind the Bmw 225i xDrive Active Tourer).
216d Gran Tourer
116 hp, 11,5 s 0-100 : among the 25 M 2016–2020, the 216d Gran Tourer ranks 5th of 25 in Combined consumption, 5th of 25 in Tank range, 23th of 25 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
116hp
270 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
11.5s
VMax 192 km/h
Cons.
4.4L
/100 km
Tank
51L
Full specifications BMW 216d Gran Tourer
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,496 cm³ |
| Power | 116 hp |
| Couple | 270 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 51 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,5 s |
| VMax | 192 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,568 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,780 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,608 mm |
| Boot | 645 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,480 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 116 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 25 M, the 216d Gran Tourer ranks (top 5 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 5th of 25 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100), 5th of 25 in Tank range (1159 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (1st with 4.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (1st with 1275 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.4 L/100 L/100 (5th of 25 in Combined consumption)
The 216d Gran Tourer consumes 4.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (4.0 L/100).
Tank range: 1159 km (5th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 216d Gran Tourer covers 1159 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1275 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 216d Gran Tourer stands against M
Comparison across 25 M marketed between 2016–2020.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 216d Gran Tourer
BMW 216d Gran Tourer: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1159 km on a full tank (4.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 5th of 25 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Active Tourer leads in Combined consumption (4.0 L/100 vs 4.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 216d Gran Tourer vs Bmw 216d Active Tourer duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.