A 250
224 hp, 6,2 s 0-100 : among the 138 compacts 2017–2021, the A 250 ranks 106th of 134 in Combined consumption, 33th of 138 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
224hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.2s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
6.5L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes A 250
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,991 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 224 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,5 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,2 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,419 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,729 mm |
| Width | 1,796 mm |
| Height | 1,440 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,450 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 148 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 138 compacts, the A 250 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
compact among the best in segment: 33th of 138 in 0–100 km/h (6.2 s).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M140i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.5 L/100 L/100 (106th of 134 in Combined consumption)
The A 250 consumes 6.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the A 250 stands against compacts
Comparison across 138 compacts marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption
106eout of 134
0–100 km/h
33eout of 138
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Golf 8 GTI
245 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
230i Coupe
245 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
Focus ST 250 Gen3
250 hp · 0-100 6.5 s
230i
252 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes A W177 range
Generation W177 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the W177
Compare
Popular duels involving the A 250
Take the next step
Find a A 250 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes A 250: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 138 compacts 2017–2021, the A 250 ranks 106th of 134 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 33th of 138 in 0–100 km/h (6.2 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 6.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A 250 vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.