2023 · GENERATION 2023 · COMPACT
MGBEV

MG4 XPower AWD

435 hp, 385 km range, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 5 compacts electric 2021–2025, the MG4 XPower AWD ranks 5th of 5 in WLTP range, 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate50715,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

435hp

600 Nm · 435 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

3.8s

VMax 200 km/h

Range

385km

WLTP

DC charging

kW

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications MG MG4 XPower AWD

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Puissance électrique435 hp
Combined power435 hp
Couple600 Nm
GearboxREDUCER_2SPEED Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Battery and charging

Battery capacity62 kWh
Range WLTP385 km
Conso élec WLTP17,8 kWh/100km
Cons. WLTP17,8 L/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,8 s
VMax200 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width1,845 mm
Height1,645 mm
Kerb weight1,985 kg
Cd0.268

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 5 compacts electric, the MG4 XPower AWD ranks (last in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s). 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s).

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie (1st with 710 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the MG MG4 Trophy AWD (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 385 km WLTP (5th of 5 in WLTP range)

The MG4 XPower AWD offers 385 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie (710 km).

Segment positioning

Where the MG4 XPower AWD stands against compacts electric

Comparison across 5 compacts electric marketed between 2021–2025.

WLTP range

5eout of 5

385 km
Min385 km · MG MG4 XPower AWD
Max710 km · Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie

0–100 km/h

2eout of 5

3,8 s
Min5,7 s · Cupra Born VZ
Max3,8 s · MG MG4 Trophy AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the MG4 XPower AWD

Take the next step

Find a MG4 XPower AWD or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

MG MG4 XPower AWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the MG4 XPower AWD rank in its segment?#

Among the 5 compacts electric 2021–2025, the MG4 XPower AWD ranks 5th of 5 in WLTP range (385 km, behind the Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie), 2nd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the MG MG4 Trophy AWD).

What is the WLTP range of the MG4 XPower AWD?#

385 km WLTP announced — making it the 5th of 5 in autonomie du segment out of 5 models. The reference is the Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie (710 km).

How much does the MG4 XPower AWD cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie instead?#

The Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie leads in WLTP range (710 km vs 385 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the MG4 XPower AWD vs Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.