Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /large SUV
AQ7PHEVvsBi5BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ7 · i5

Audi Q7 SUV vs BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2025 vs 2025 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiPHEVPlus rapide

Q7 SUV

489 ch · 22 kWh · 2025

VS
BMWBEV

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi Q7 SUV

7h06charging included

1 stop · 195.63 €

Gap16 minin favour of Q7 SUV
BBMW i5 eDrive40 G60

7h22charging included

2 stops · 49.80 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ7 SUVi5 eDrive40 G60Gap
Total time7h067h2216 min · Q7 SUV
Charging stops1 stop2 stops1 stop · Q7 SUV
Cost of energy used195.63 €49.80 €145.83 € · i5 eDrive40 G60

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiPHEVFastest
Q7 SUV
100%
Battery
100%
Fuel tank
612 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +68 L · 146.47 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
195.63 €
Cost of energy used
BMWBEV
i5 eDrive40 G60
100%
453 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
9 min · +30 kWh · 17.95 €
Charge 2
12 min · +36 kWh · 21.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h22
2
Stops
7h22
Duration
49.80 €
Cost of energy used

The 16-minute lead of the Q7 SUV does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (1 vs 2).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the Q7 SUV versus 2 stops totalling 21 min for the i5 eDrive40 G60.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (28,6 kWh/100km for Q7 SUV and 18,0 kWh/100km for i5 eDrive40 G60) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 12,6 L/100km (Q7 SUV) and 16,5 kWh/100km (i5 eDrive40 G60). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 0,6× the electric cost of the Q7 SUV and 2,2× that of the i5 eDrive40 G60. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi Q7 SUV

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh77 km22 kWh consumed0.057 €/km4.41 €
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L535 km68 L consumed0.274 €/km146.47 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L163 km21 L consumed0.275 €/km44.75 €
Trip total195.63 €

BMW i5 eDrive40 G60

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh408 km67 kWh consumed0.033 €/km13.47 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 199 kW · 0.60 €/kWh181 km30 kWh consumed0.099 €/km17.95 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 178 kW · 0.60 €/kWh186 km31 kWh consumed0.099 €/km18.38 €
Trip total49.80 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi Q7 SUVBMW i5 eDrive40 G60
5 minutes-~72 km
10 minutes-~145 km
20 minutes-~290 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~317 km · 24 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
28.6 kWh/100 km · 18.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
22 kWh · 74.8 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiPHEV

Q7 SUV

489 ch · 22 kWh · 2025

BMWBEV

i5 eDrive40 G60

313 ch · 74.8 kWh · 2025

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q7 SUV vs ActiveHybrid X6

BMWVSAudi

i5 eDrive40 vs A6 Avant e-tron

AudiVSPorsche

Q7 SUV vs Cayenne E-Hybrid

TeslaVSBMW

Model S 85 vs i5 eDrive40

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Q7 SUV arrives in 7h06 with 1 stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 195.63 € (Q7 SUV) and 49.80 € (i5 eDrive40 G60). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.