Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
ARS6vsBM5Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS6 · M5

Audi RS6 Performance Avant vs BMW M5 Competition F90

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2023 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiPetrol

RS6 Performance Avant

630 ch · 2023

VS
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

M5 Competition F90

625 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi RS6 Performance Avant

7h06charging included

1 stop · 238.14 €

Gap5 minin favour of M5 Competition
BBMW M5 Competition F90

7h01no stop

0 stops · 131.18 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS6 Performance AvantM5 Competition F90Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · M5 Competition F90
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · M5 Competition F90
Cost of energy used238.14 €131.18 €106.96 € · M5 Competition F90

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiPetrol
RS6 Performance Avant
100%
464 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +66 L · 142.57 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
238.14 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrolFastest
M5 Competition F90
100%
872 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
131.18 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the M5 Competition F90 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the M5 Competition F90 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the RS6 Performance Avant.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (12,0 L/100km for RS6 Performance Avant and 10,6 L/100km for M5 Competition F90) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 14,2 L/100km (RS6 Performance Avant) and 7,8 L/100km (M5 Competition F90). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi RS6 Performance Avant

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L464 km66 L consumed0.307 €/km142.57 €
Limonest, A6 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L311 km44 L consumed0.307 €/km95.57 €
Trip total238.14 €

BMW M5 Competition F90

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km60 L consumed0.169 €/km131.18 €
Trip total131.18 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
12.0 L/100 km · 10.6 L/100 km
Fuel tank
73 L · 68 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiPetrol

RS6 Performance Avant

630 ch · 2023

BMWPetrol

M5 Competition F90

625 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

RS6 Performance Avant vs M5 Competition

BMWVSAudi

M5 Competition vs A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

AudiVSBMW

RS6 Performance Avant vs M5 Competition

BMWVSAudi

M5 Competition vs A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M5 Competition F90 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 238.14 € (RS6 Performance Avant) and 131.18 € (M5 Competition F90). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.