Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Motorway›Audi S vs Tesla Model

Motorway range comparison

Audi S e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S Long Range

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

AudiBEVPlus rapide

S e-tron GT

670 ch · 105 kWh · 2025

VS
TeslaBEV

Model S Long Range

670 ch · 100 kWh · 2023

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO
Simulation trip

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation

S e-tron GTModel S Long Range
Total time7h13−4 min7h17
Charging stops1 stop1 stop
Total cost42,75 €41,91 €−0,84 €

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiBEVFastest
S e-tron GT
100%
560 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
12 min · +57 kWh · 25.44 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h13
1
Stops
7h13
Duration
42,75 €
Cost
TeslaBEV
Model S Long Range
100%
549 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
16 min · +57 kWh · 25.47 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h17
1
Stops
7h17
Duration
41,91 €
Cost

Analysis

The 4-minute lead of the S e-tron GT does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (12 min vs 16 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 12 min for the S e-tron GT versus 1 stop of 16 min for the Model S Long Range.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (15,9 kWh/100km for S e-tron GT and 17,4 kWh/100km for Model S Long Range) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily — it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve — not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 18,8 kWh/100km (S e-tron GT) and 18,2 kWh/100km (Model S Long Range). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.

Recovery speed: 25,1 km/min versus 19,4 km/min

During the 12 minutes of charging for the S e-tron GT, range recovers by 301 km. During the 16 cumulative minutes for the Model S Long Range, range recovers by 311 km. Per minute: the S e-tron GT recovers 1,3× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol SUV cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 2,7× the electric cost of the S e-tron GT and 2,7× that of the Model S Long Range. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment — based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi

S e-tron GT

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0,21 €/kWh504 km95 kWh consumed0,039 €/km19,84 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 283 kW · 0,45 €/kWh271 km51 kWh consumed0,085 €/km22,91 €
Trip total42,75 €
Tesla

Model S Long Range

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0,21 €/kWh494 km90 kWh consumed0,038 €/km18,90 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 212 kW · 0,45 €/kWh281 km51 kWh consumed0,082 €/km23,01 €
Trip total41,91 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.

Charging stop durationAudi S e-tron GTTesla Model S Long Range
5 minutes~99 km~80 km
10 minutes~199 km~160 km
20 minutes~398 km~320 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~392 km21 min~384 km26 min

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiBEV

S e-tron GT

670 ch · 105 kWh · 2025

TeslaBEV

Model S Long Range

670 ch · 100 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBmw

S e-tron GT vs 540i xDrive

AudiVSXiaomi

S e-tron GT vs SU7 RWD Standard

AudiVSBmw

S e-tron GT vs M240i

BmwVSTesla

620d Gran Turismo vs Model S Long Range

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the S e-tron GT arrives in 7h13 with 1 charging stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

Electric: 42,75 € (S e-tron GT) and 41,91 € (Model S Long Range). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.