Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AS6vsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsS6 · Model 3

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron vs Tesla Model 3 Performance

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2026 vs 2019 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiBEV

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026

VS
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model 3 Performance

450 ch · 74 kWh · 2019

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi S6 Sportback e-tron

7h33charging included

2 stops · 56.56 €

Gap9 minin favour of Model 3 Performance
BTesla Model 3 Performance

7h24charging included

3 stops · 64.37 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureS6 Sportback e-tronModel 3 PerformanceGap
Total time7h337h249 min · Model 3 Performance
Charging stops2 stops3 stops1 stop · S6 Sportback e-tron
Cost of energy used56.56 €64.37 €7.81 € · S6 Sportback e-tron

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiBEV
S6 Sportback e-tron
100%
485 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +38 kWh · 22.66 €
Charge 2
15 min · +34 kWh · 20.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h33
2
Stops
7h33
Duration
56.56 €
Cost of energy used
TeslaBEVFastest
Model 3 Performance
100%
378 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
7 min · +30 kWh · 17.76 €
Charge 2
7 min · +30 kWh · 17.76 €
Charge 3
8 min · +32 kWh · 19.04 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
3
Stops
7h24
Duration
64.37 €
Cost of energy used

The 9-minute lead of the Model 3 Performance does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (3 vs 2).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 23 min for the Model 3 Performance versus 2 stops totalling 32 min for the S6 Sportback e-tron.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (16,5 kWh/100km for S6 Sportback e-tron and 16,6 kWh/100km for Model 3 Performance) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,5 kWh/100km (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 19,6 kWh/100km (Model 3 Performance). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 20,2 km/min versus 11,5 km/min

During the 23 minutes of charging for the Model 3 Performance, range recovers by 464 km. During the 32 cumulative minutes for the S6 Sportback e-tron, range recovers by 368 km. Per minute: the Model 3 Performance recovers 1,8× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 2,0× the electric cost of the S6 Sportback e-tron and 1,8× that of the Model 3 Performance. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh436 km85 kWh consumed0.039 €/km17.00 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 133 kW · 0.60 €/kWh194 km38 kWh consumed0.117 €/km22.66 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 136 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km28 kWh consumed0.117 €/km16.90 €
Trip total56.56 €

Tesla Model 3 Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh340 km67 kWh consumed0.039 €/km13.33 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 254 kW · 0.60 €/kWh151 km30 kWh consumed0.118 €/km17.76 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 254 kW · 0.60 €/kWh151 km30 kWh consumed0.118 €/km17.76 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 238 kW · 0.60 €/kWh132 km26 kWh consumed0.118 €/km15.52 €
Trip total64.37 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi S6 Sportback e-tronTesla Model 3 Performance
5 minutes-~75 km
10 minutes-~149 km
20 minutes-~298 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~265 km · 19 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
16.5 kWh/100 km · 16.6 kWh/100 km
Net battery
94.4 kWh · 74 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiBEV

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 ch · 94.4 kWh · 2026

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

450 ch · 74 kWh · 2019

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

S6 Sportback e-tron vs Taycan 4S

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan 4S Cross Turismo vs S6 Sportback e-tron

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model 3 Performance arrives in 7h24 with 3 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 56.56 € (S6 Sportback e-tron) and 64.37 € (Model 3 Performance). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.