Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Motorway›BMW M240i vs BMW 120d

Motorway range comparison

BMW M240i F44 vs BMW 120d xDrive F20LCI

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

BMWPetrol

M240i F44

340 ch · 2020

VS
BMWDiesel

120d xDrive F20LCI

190 ch · 2018

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO
Simulation trip

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation

M240i F44120d xDrive F20LCI
Total time7h017h01
Charging stops0 stops0 stops
Total cost92,54 €74,03 €−18,51 €

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
M240i F44
100%
867 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
92,54 €
Cost
BMWDiesel
120d xDrive F20LCI
100%
1083 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
74,03 €
Cost

Analysis

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the M240i F44 versus no stop for the 120d xDrive F20LCI.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,3 L/100km for M240i F44 and 5,2 L/100km for 120d xDrive F20LCI) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,0 L/100km (M240i F44) and 4,8 L/100km (120d xDrive F20LCI). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW

M240i F44

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Marseillefuel · 1,99 €/L775 km47 L consumed0,119 €/km92,53 €
Trip total92,54 €
BMW

120d xDrive F20LCI

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Marseillefuel · 1,99 €/L775 km37 L consumed0,096 €/km74,03 €
Trip total74,03 €

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M240i F44

340 ch · 2020

BMWDiesel

120d xDrive F20LCI

190 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

BmwVSAudi

M240i vs S3 Sedan

BmwVSAudi

120d xDrive vs A3 Sedan

BmwVSAudi

M240i vs S3 Sportback

BmwVSAudi

120d xDrive vs A3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M240i F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

Electric: 92,54 € (M240i F44) and 74,03 € (120d xDrive F20LCI). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.