Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /MPV
A216ivsB216iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs216i · 216i

BMW 216i Active Tourer G42 vs BMW 216i Active Tourer F44

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

MPV · 2022 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

216i Active Tourer G42

122 ch · 2022

VS
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

216i Active Tourer F44

109 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW 216i Active Tourer G42

7h06charging included

1 stop · 135.21 €

Gap5 minin favour of 216i Active Tourer
BBMW 216i Active Tourer F44

7h01no stop

0 stops · 80.72 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measure216i Active Tourer G42216i Active Tourer F44Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · 216i Active Tourer F44
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · 216i Active Tourer F44
Cost of energy used135.21 €80.72 €54.49 € · 216i Active Tourer F44

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
216i Active Tourer G42
100%
504 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +41 L · 87.88 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
135.21 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrolFastest
216i Active Tourer F44
100%
1063 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
80.72 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 216i Active Tourer F44 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 216i Active Tourer F44 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the 216i Active Tourer G42.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (6,7 L/100km for 216i Active Tourer G42 and 5,6 L/100km for 216i Active Tourer F44) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 8,0 L/100km (216i Active Tourer G42) and 4,8 L/100km (216i Active Tourer F44). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW 216i Active Tourer G42

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L504 km41 L consumed0.174 €/km87.88 €
Valence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L271 km22 L consumed0.175 €/km47.33 €
Trip total135.21 €

BMW 216i Active Tourer F44

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km37 L consumed0.104 €/km80.72 €
Trip total80.72 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.7 L/100 km · 5.6 L/100 km
Fuel tank
45 L · 51 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

216i Active Tourer G42

122 ch · 2022

BMWPetrol

216i Active Tourer F44

109 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSCitroen

216i Active Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

CitroenVSBMW

Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD vs 216i Active Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 216i Active Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 216i Active Tourer

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 216i Active Tourer F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 135.21 € (216i Active Tourer G42) and 80.72 € (216i Active Tourer F44). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.