Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /MPV
A218dDieselvsB216iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs218d · 216i

BMW 218d Gran Tourer F22 vs BMW 216i Active Tourer G42

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

MPV · 2018 vs 2022 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWDieselPlus rapide

218d Gran Tourer F22

150 ch · 2018

VS
BMWPetrol

216i Active Tourer G42

122 ch · 2022

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW 218d Gran Tourer F22

7h01no stop

0 stops · 70.63 €

Gap5 minin favour of 218d Gran Tourer
BBMW 216i Active Tourer G42

7h06charging included

1 stop · 135.21 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measure218d Gran Tourer F22216i Active Tourer G42Gap
Total time7h017h065 min · 218d Gran Tourer F22
Charging stops0 stops1 stop1 stop · 218d Gran Tourer F22
Cost of energy used70.63 €135.21 €64.58 € · 218d Gran Tourer F22

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWDieselFastest
218d Gran Tourer F22
100%
1214 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
70.63 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrol
216i Active Tourer G42
100%
504 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +41 L · 87.88 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
135.21 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 218d Gran Tourer F22 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 218d Gran Tourer F22 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the 216i Active Tourer G42.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (4,6 L/100km for 218d Gran Tourer F22 and 6,7 L/100km for 216i Active Tourer G42) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 4,2 L/100km (218d Gran Tourer F22) and 8,0 L/100km (216i Active Tourer G42). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW 218d Gran Tourer F22

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km33 L consumed0.091 €/km70.63 €
Trip total70.63 €

BMW 216i Active Tourer G42

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L504 km41 L consumed0.174 €/km87.88 €
Valence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L271 km22 L consumed0.175 €/km47.33 €
Trip total135.21 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
4.6 L/100 km · 6.7 L/100 km
Fuel tank
51 L · 45 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWDiesel

218d Gran Tourer F22

150 ch · 2018

BMWPetrol

216i Active Tourer G42

122 ch · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 218d Gran Tourer

BMWVSCitroen

216i Active Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

BMWVSCitroen

218d Gran Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 216i Active Tourer

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 218d Gran Tourer F22 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 70.63 € (218d Gran Tourer F22) and 135.21 € (216i Active Tourer G42). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.