Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /MPV
A220dDieselvsB220dHybrid
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs220d · 220d

BMW 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44 vs BMW 220d Active Tourer G42

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

MPV · 2020 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWDieselPlus rapide

220d xDrive Active Tourer F44

190 ch · 2020

VS
BMWHybrid

220d Active Tourer G42

163 ch · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44

7h01no stop

0 stops · 74.00 €

Gap5 minin favour of 220d xDrive Active Tourer
BBMW 220d Active Tourer G42

7h06charging included

1 stop · 98.89 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measure220d xDrive Active Tourer F44220d Active Tourer G42Gap
Total time7h017h065 min · 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44
Charging stops0 stops1 stop1 stop · 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44
Cost of energy used74.00 €98.89 €24.89 € · 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWDieselFastest
220d xDrive Active Tourer F44
100%
1159 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
74.00 €
Cost of energy used
BMWHybrid
220d Active Tourer G42
100%
689 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +41 L · 87.88 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
98.89 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the 220d Active Tourer G42.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (4,7 L/100km for 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44 and 4,9 L/100km for 220d Active Tourer G42) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 4,4 L/100km (220d xDrive Active Tourer F44) and 5,9 L/100km (220d Active Tourer G42). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km34 L consumed0.095 €/km74.00 €
Trip total74.00 €

BMW 220d Active Tourer G42

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L689 km40 L consumed0.128 €/km87.88 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L86 km5 L consumed0.128 €/km11.00 €
Trip total98.89 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
4.7 L/100 km · 4.9 L/100 km
Fuel tank
51 L · 45 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWDiesel

220d xDrive Active Tourer F44

190 ch · 2020

BMWHybrid

220d Active Tourer G42

163 ch · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 220d xDrive Active Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 220d Active Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 220d xDrive Active Tourer

BMWVSCitroen

220d Active Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 220d xDrive Active Tourer F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 74.00 € (220d xDrive Active Tourer F44) and 98.89 € (220d Active Tourer G42). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.