220d Active Tourer
163 hp, 8,3 s 0-100 : among the 2 M hybrid 2022–2026, the 220d Active Tourer ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
163hp
400 Nm · 20 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
8.3s
VMax 220 km/h
Cons.
4.9L
/100 km
Tank
45L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 220d Active Tourer
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance électrique | 20 hp |
| Combined power | 163 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4,9 L/100km |
| Tank | 45 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,3 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,386 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,824 mm |
| Height | 1,576 mm |
| Boot | 415 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,565 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 128 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 2 M hybrid, the 220d Active Tourer ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. Combined consumption (4.9 L/100), Tank range (918 km).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw 223i xDrive Active Tourer (1st with 6.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.9 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The 220d Active Tourer consumes 4.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 220d Active Tourer (4.9 L/100).
Tank range: 918 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the 220d Active Tourer covers 918 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 918 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 220d Active Tourer stands against M hybrid
Comparison across 2 M hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption
1eout of 2
Tank range
1eout of 2
0–100 km/h
2eout of 2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
245 hp · 0-100 8.2 s
Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD
110 hp · 0-100 12.5 s
V 300 d 4MATIC
245 hp · 0-100 8.2 s
X9
543 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 2 Series G42 range
Generation G42 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G42
Compare
Popular duels involving the 220d Active Tourer
Take the next step
Find a 220d Active Tourer or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 220d Active Tourer: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 2 M hybrid 2022–2026, the 220d Active Tourer ranks Combined consumption (4.9 L/100, behind the Bmw 220d Active Tourer), Tank range (918 km, behind the Bmw 220d Active Tourer), 0–100 km/h (8.3 s, behind the Bmw 223i xDrive Active Tourer).
918 km on a full tank (4.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) — autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.