Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
A540iPetrolvsBEQSBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs540i · EQS

BMW 540i G30 vs Mercedes EQS 450 V297

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2020 vs 2023 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

540i G30

333 ch · 2020

VS
MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW 540i G30

7h01no stop

0 stops · 90.81 €

Gap23 minin favour of 540i
BMercedes EQS 450 V297

7h24charging included

2 stops · 58.85 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measure540i G30EQS 450 V297Gap
Total time7h017h2423 min · 540i G30
Charging stops0 stops2 stops2 stops · 540i G30
Cost of energy used90.81 €58.85 €31.96 € · EQS 450 V297

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
540i G30
100%
1259 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
90.81 €
Cost of energy used
MercedesBEV
EQS 450 V297
100%
513 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +43 kWh · 25.87 €
Charge 2
9 min · +29 kWh · 17.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
2
Stops
7h24
Duration
58.85 €
Cost of energy used

The 23-minute lead of the 540i G30 (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: no stop versus 2 stops totalling 23 min for the EQS 450 V297 (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The 540i G30 (combustion) makes no stop, the EQS 450 V297 (electric) 2 stops totalling 23 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 90,81 € for 540i G30 versus 58,85 € for EQS 450 V297.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (6,5 L/100km for 540i G30 and 18,3 kWh/100km for EQS 450 V297) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 5,4 L/100km (540i G30) and 21,0 kWh/100km (EQS 450 V297). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW 540i G30

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km42 L consumed0.117 €/km90.81 €
Trip total90.81 €

Mercedes EQS 450 V297

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh462 km97 kWh consumed0.042 €/km19.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 185 kW · 0.60 €/kWh205 km43 kWh consumed0.126 €/km25.87 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 193 kW · 0.60 €/kWh108 km23 kWh consumed0.126 €/km13.57 €
Trip total58.85 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW 540i G30Mercedes EQS 450 V297
5 minutes-~56 km
10 minutes-~111 km
20 minutes-~222 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~359 km · 31 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.5 L/100 km · 18.3 kWh/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

540i G30

333 ch · 2020

MercedesBEV

EQS 450 V297

333 ch · 107.8 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW vs 540i

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW vs 540i

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 540i G30 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 90.81 € (540i G30) and 58.85 € (EQS 450 V297). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.