Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact
AM240ivsB530iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM240i · 530i

BMW M240i F44 vs BMW 530i G30

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact · 2020 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

M240i F44

340 ch · 2020

VS
BMWPetrol

530i G30

252 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW M240i F44

7h01no stop

0 stops · 100.91 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BBMW 530i G30

7h01no stop

0 stops · 80.72 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM240i F44530i G30Gap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used100.91 €80.72 €20.19 € · 530i G30

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
M240i F44
100%
867 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
100.91 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrol
530i G30
100%
1417 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
80.72 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the M240i F44 versus no stop for the 530i G30.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,3 L/100km for M240i F44 and 5,5 L/100km for 530i G30) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,0 L/100km (M240i F44) and 4,8 L/100km (530i G30). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW M240i F44

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km47 L consumed0.130 €/km100.91 €
Trip total100.91 €

BMW 530i G30

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km37 L consumed0.104 €/km80.72 €
Trip total80.72 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.3 L/100 km · 5.5 L/100 km
Fuel tank
52 L · 68 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M240i F44

340 ch · 2020

BMWPetrol

530i G30

252 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M240i vs S3 Sedan

BMWVSVolvo

530i vs S90 B5 AWD

BMWVSAudi

M240i vs S3 Sportback

BMWVSVolvo

530i vs V90 B5 AWD

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M240i F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 100.91 € (M240i F44) and 80.72 € (530i G30). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.