Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
AM3PetrolvsBA6BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM3 · A6

BMW M3 F80 vs Audi A6 Avant e-tron

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2020 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

M3 F80

480 ch · 2020

VS
AudiBEV

A6 Avant e-tron

381 ch · 94.9 kWh · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW M3 F80

7h06charging included

1 stop · 134.54 €

Gap9 minin favour of M3
BAudi A6 Avant e-tron

7h15charging included

1 stop · 47.05 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM3 F80A6 Avant e-tronGap
Total time7h067h159 min · M3 F80
Charging stops1 stop1 stopSame
Cost of energy used134.54 €47.05 €87.49 € · A6 Avant e-tron

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
M3 F80
100%
664 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +53 L · 115.23 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
134.54 €
Cost of energy used
AudiBEV
A6 Avant e-tron
100%
543 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
14 min · +55 kWh · 33.11 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h15
1
Stops
7h15
Duration
47.05 €
Cost of energy used

The 9-minute lead of the M3 F80 (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: 1 stop of 5 min versus 1 stop of 14 min for the A6 Avant e-tron (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The M3 F80 (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the A6 Avant e-tron (electric) 1 stop of 14 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 134,54 € for M3 F80 versus 47,05 € for A6 Avant e-tron.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,8 L/100km for M3 F80 and 14,8 kWh/100km for A6 Avant e-tron) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 8,0 L/100km (M3 F80) and 17,5 kWh/100km (A6 Avant e-tron). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW M3 F80

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L664 km53 L consumed0.174 €/km115.23 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L111 km9 L consumed0.174 €/km19.31 €
Trip total134.54 €

Audi A6 Avant e-tron

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh489 km85 kWh consumed0.035 €/km17.09 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 236 kW · 0.60 €/kWh286 km50 kWh consumed0.105 €/km29.96 €
Trip total47.05 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW M3 F80Audi A6 Avant e-tron
5 minutes-~90 km
10 minutes-~180 km
20 minutes-~361 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~380 km · 23 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.8 L/100 km · 14.8 kWh/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M3 F80

480 ch · 2020

AudiBEV

A6 Avant e-tron

381 ch · 94.9 kWh · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M3 vs S5 Avant

BMWVSAudi

i5 xDrive40 vs A6 Avant e-tron

BMWVSAudi

M3 vs S5 Sedan

BMWVSAudi

i5 xDrive40 Touring vs A6 Avant e-tron

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M3 F80 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 134.54 € (M3 F80) and 47.05 € (A6 Avant e-tron). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.