Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AM5PetrolvsBP7BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM5 · P7

BMW M5 F90 vs Xpeng P7

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2018 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

M5 F90

600 ch · 2018

VS
XpengBEV

P7

424 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW M5 F90

7h06charging included

1 stop · 146.31 €

Gap75 minin favour of M5
BXpeng P7

8h21charging included

3 stops · 68.98 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM5 F90P7Gap
Total time7h068h2175 min · M5 F90
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · M5 F90
Cost of energy used146.31 €68.98 €77.33 € · P7

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
M5 F90
100%
703 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +61 L · 132.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
146.31 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
P7
100%
363 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 2
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 3
33 min · +39 kWh · 23.19 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h21
3
Stops
8h21
Duration
68.98 €
Cost of energy used

The 75-minute lead of the M5 F90 (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: 1 stop of 5 min versus 3 stops totalling 80 min for the P7 (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The M5 F90 (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the P7 (electric) 3 stops totalling 80 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 68 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 146,31 € for M5 F90 versus 68,98 € for P7.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,8 L/100km for M5 F90 and 17,2 kWh/100km for P7) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 8,7 L/100km (M5 F90) and 20,6 kWh/100km (P7). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW M5 F90

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L703 km61 L consumed0.189 €/km132.80 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L72 km6 L consumed0.188 €/km13.51 €
Trip total146.31 €

Xpeng P7

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh327 km68 kWh consumed0.041 €/km13.51 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km30 kWh consumed0.124 €/km18.00 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh145 km30 kWh consumed0.124 €/km18.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 70 kW · 0.60 €/kWh157 km32 kWh consumed0.124 €/km19.48 €
Trip total68.98 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW M5 F90Xpeng P7
5 minutes-~23 km
10 minutes-~45 km
20 minutes-~90 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~254 km · 61 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.8 L/100 km · 17.2 kWh/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M5 F90

600 ch · 2018

XpengBEV

P7

424 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

RS6 Performance Avant vs M5

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 Performance vs P7

BMWVSAudi

M5 vs A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 Performance vs P7

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M5 F90 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 146.31 € (M5 F90) and 68.98 € (P7). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.